|
TO REACH THE LOCAL PETITION FOR SIGNING CLICK HERE TO COMPLETE THE CONSULTATION (see guidance below) CLICK HERE FOR SUGGESTED RESPONSES TO THE CONSULTATION CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ABOUT THE PROPOSALS PLEASE SEE BELOW
The government has published 2 white papers which if enacted will radically change the planning system giving more power to developers. The most urgent campaign is against the paper 'Changes to the current planning system' as this could come into force before Christmas. For links to the consultation papers and suggested responses please see the points above. Although the consultations have now closed, it is not too late to lobby your MP.
Introduction to This is one of two important documents issued for
consultation by the Government (White Papers), and responses to it are required
by 1 October. The second (“Planning for the Future”) asks for responses by
29 October. Taken together, they come “at a crucial time for the future of
democratic planning in England, with the real prospect that a system designed to
uphold the public interest will
be effectively
extinguished by the
end of 2020” [Dr Hugh
Ellis, Director Policy, Town and Country Planning Association, introducing a
report on the proposals as “a serious heavyweight analysis from a group of
the nation’s leading planning academics”]. We might all agree that changes to planning processes are
required in a number of areas – perhaps especially in relation to its
complexity and (sometimes) its lack of transparency, both of which have led to a
serious lack of public confidence in the system (and, by extension, in local
democracy); however, in the view of many people, the current proposals would
simply make matters worse. This short note is designed to encourage everyone concerned
with the future of planning decisions in this country to respond to the
Government’s proposals – and to express strong opposition to most of them.
In view of the urgency, it is limited to the first of the two White
Papers, entitled “Changes to the Current Planning System”. The White paper poses a total of 35 questions to which
responses are sought. Many of these are technical in nature, but they fall into
a number of broad topics, four of which are the subject of this note. 1. Amendments to the standard method for assessing
housing numbers in strategic plans A
number of detailed changes to this are proposed, resulting in a simplified and
uniform basis for calculating housing land requirements which “Planning for
the Future” says should now be determined by central government and
effectively imposed on local authorities. This would leave little room for
meaningful community engagement (contrary to the Governments’ stated
intentions) or for account to be taken of local circumstances. Many commentators
have also pointed out that changing the methodology in the way proposed would
result in completely unachievable targets in some parts of the country, as well
as a reduction in housing requirements for many areas where high levels of
housing delivery have actually been successfully attained. 2. Delivering First Homes 3. Developer Contributions – smaller schemes 4. Extension of the “Permission in Principle”
Consent Regime PiP currently applies to housing developments of fewer than
10 dwellings. “Planning for the Future” would radically change the existing
system by introducing automatic planning permissions in a wide number of
circumstances – something to which there has been widespread opposition
nationally. As a stop-gap measure, the present White Paper would immediately
extend Permission in Principle to encompass major developments. There is no evidence that the introduction of PiPs has had
any benefits over the traditional system of outline planning permission followed
by subsequent consideration of the detail. Increasing its scope would simply
introduce more, not less, uncertainty about what is actually being proposed and
what its impacts might be – this is because less information need be provided
by the developer when submitting a PiP application (and often it is no more than
is already available through examination of the policies in the local plan. This
again can only weaken the public’s confidence in the system. |